People v. Fraticelli
This text of 172 A.D.2d 622 (People v. Fraticelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered January 12, 1988, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We disagree.
[623]*623At around 5:00 a.m., on April 10, 1987, moments after an alarm sounded, a Yonkers police officer saw the defendant with his arm partially through a jagged hole in the glass door entrance to a restaurant. After apprehending the defendant, the police noticed that both his hand and the glass door were bloody. The evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant, who had no authorization to enter upon the premises, entered the restaurant with the intent to commit a larceny therein (see, Penal Law § 140.40; People v King, 61 NY2d 550, 555; People v Barnes, 50 NY2d 375, 381; People v Mitchell, 151 AD2d 699).
We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 A.D.2d 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fraticelli-nyappdiv-1991.