People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Murphy

201 A.D.2d 940, 609 N.Y.S.2d 883

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1994

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 940 (People v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Murphy, 201 A.D.2d 940, 609 N.Y.S.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted (see, People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38). Memorandum: We have considered the issue raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and conclude that the sentence imposed upon defendant is not harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Feeman, Jr., J.— Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s application to withdraw granted (see, People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38). Memorandum: We have considered the issue raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and conclude that the sentence imposed upon defendant is not harsh or excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Allegany County Court, Feeman, Jr., J.— Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 940, 609 N.Y.S.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack