People v. Foster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Foster

147 A.D.2d 656, 538 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2036

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A.D.2d 656 (People v. Foster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Foster, 147 A.D.2d 656, 538 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered June 8, 1988, convicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree and operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s request for youthful offender status. Moreover, we find no basis for exercising our discretion by vacating the conviction and adjudicating the defendant a youthful offender.

The defendant’s other contentions are either without merit, or need not be addressed in light of our determination. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered June 8, 1988, convicting him of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree and operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court did not abuse its discretion by denying the defendant’s request for youthful offender status. Moreover, we find no basis for exercising our discretion by vacating the conviction and adjudicating the defendant a youthful offender.

The defendant’s other contentions are either without merit, or need not be addressed in light of our determination. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A.D.2d 656, 538 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-foster-nyappdiv-1989.