People v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Perry

215 A.D.2d 505, 627 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 A.D.2d 505 (People v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Perry, 215 A.D.2d 505, 627 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), both rendered January 14, 1992, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 668/89, upon a jury verdict, and bail jumping in the second degree under Indictment No. 1056/91, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of attempted robbery in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, [506]*506upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Copertino and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), both rendered January 14, 1992, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 668/89, upon a jury verdict, and bail jumping in the second degree under Indictment No. 1056/91, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), it is legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of attempted robbery in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, [506]*506upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt is not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Copertino and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 505, 627 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perry-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack