People v. Fontanez

284 A.D.2d 477, 726 N.Y.S.2d 573, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6333
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fontanez. Read the opinion of the Court — 278 A.D.2d 933

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered June 20, 2000, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal mischief [478]*478in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Luciano, Feuerstein and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fontanez, 284 A.D.2d 477, 726 N.Y.S.2d 573, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6333 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 477 (People v. Fontanez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)