People v. Fonseca

284 A.D.2d 260, 728 N.Y.S.2d 138, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fonseca. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 A.D.2d 239

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Walsh, J., at plea; Robert Sackett, J., at sentence), rendered October 20, 1998, convicting defendant of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea after defendant was afforded ample opportunity to present his claims (People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Defendant did not expand upon his conclusory claim of innocence, and his claim that he pleaded guilty because he was “scared and nervous” about his sentencing exposure if convicted after trial would not require withdrawal of the plea. The court properly concluded that defendant’s challenges to the plea were contradicted by his plea allocution and that the plea was voluntary. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fonseca, 284 A.D.2d 260, 728 N.Y.S.2d 138, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 260 (People v. Fonseca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Frederick
382 N.E.2d 1332 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)