People v. Fonseca

262 A.D.2d 239, 690 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7738
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 29, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, [240]*240Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered February 20, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the court’s charge on reasonable doubt are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that although the preferred phrasing was not always employed by the court, the charge, when read as a whole, conveyed the appropriate standards (see, People v Cubino, 88 NY2d 998). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fonseca, 262 A.D.2d 239, 690 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 239 (People v. Fonseca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sanders
266 A.D.2d 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)