People v. Flores

2019 NY Slip Op 2455
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 A.D.3d 182
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 2, 2019·No. 8847 1601/10·Published

Opinion

People v Flores (2019 NY Slip Op 02455)
People v Flores
2019 NY Slip Op 02455
Decided on April 2, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 2, 2019
Sweeny, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kern, Singh, JJ.

8847 1601/10

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Christopher Flores, Defendant-Appellant.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Whitney A. Robinson of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael J. Yetter of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eduardo Padró, J.), rendered May 8, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it sentenced defendant under his original plea agreement after determining that he had forfeited the opportunity for a more lenient disposition by failing to satisfy the requirement of

successful completion of a drug program (see People v Fiammegta, 14 NY3d 90, 96 [2010]; CPL 216.05[9][c]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: APRIL 2, 2019

C



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Flores, 2019 NY Slip Op 2455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 2455 (People v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fiammegta
923 N.E.2d 1123 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)