People v. Flores

2016 NY Slip Op 7761
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 A.D.3d 644
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 2016·No. 2236 3213/13·Published

Opinion

People v Flores (2016 NY Slip Op 07761)
People v Flores
2016 NY Slip Op 07761
Decided on November 17, 2016
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 17, 2016
Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman, Kahn, JJ.

2236 3213/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Francisco Flores, Defendant-Appellant.


Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jared Wolkowitz of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J.), rendered June 18, 2015,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 17, 2016

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Flores, 2016 NY Slip Op 7761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 7761 (People v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431