People v. Flores

124 A.D.3d 536, 998 N.Y.S.2d 628
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 A.D.3d 644
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 2015·No. 14043 1411/99·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barbara F. Newman, J), entered on or about April 5, 2010, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of resentencing (see e.g. People v Rodriguez, 116 AD3d 639 [1st Dept 2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 1042 [2014]). Among other things, defendant absconded and remained a fugitive for many years, during which time he trafficked in drugs in various states, and engaged in such activity even while he was in federal custody. Contrary to defendant’s assertion, the court expressly considered evidence of defendant’s rehabilitation during his most recent period of incarceration, and concluded that it was outweighed by the factors militating against resentencing (see People v Marte, 44 AD3d 442 [1st Dept 2007], lv dismissed 9 NY3d 991 [2007]).

Concur — Tom, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Moskowitz and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Flores, 124 A.D.3d 536, 998 N.Y.S.2d 628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

124 A.D.3d 536 (People v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Marte
44 A.D.3d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Rodriguez
116 A.D.3d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)