People v. Flores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Flores

67 A.D.2d 685, 412 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10287

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 67 A.D.2d 685 (People v. Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Flores, 67 A.D.2d 685, 412 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 27, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, petit larceny, resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of petit larceny, and the sentence imposed [686]*686thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Under the facts of this case, defendant could not have been guilty of robbery in the first degree without having also been guilty of petit larceny. Therefore, the guilty verdict on the robbery count requires dismissal of the lesser inclusory offense of petit larceny (see People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., O’Connor, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered June 27, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, petit larceny, resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of petit larceny, and the sentence imposed [686]*686thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Under the facts of this case, defendant could not have been guilty of robbery in the first degree without having also been guilty of petit larceny. Therefore, the guilty verdict on the robbery count requires dismissal of the lesser inclusory offense of petit larceny (see People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., O’Connor, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 A.D.2d 685, 412 N.Y.S.2d 164, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-flores-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack