People v. Flihan
This text of 532 N.E.2d 96 (People v. Flihan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
[731]*731Defendant by his plea of guilty forfeited any claim of transactional immunity (see, People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1, 6; People v Sobotker, 61 NY2d 44, 48). Defendant’s remaining contentions either lack merit or are not properly before us for review.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
532 N.E.2d 96, 73 N.Y.2d 729, 535 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-flihan-ny-1988.