People v. Fitzgerald

182 A.D.2d 925, 585 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5728

This text of 182 A.D.2d 925 (People v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fitzgerald, 182 A.D.2d 925, 585 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered March 18, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the first degree.

[926]*926Upon examining the record and brief submitted in this case, we agree with defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues raised on this appeal. Accordingly, the judgment must be affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Creeden, 150 AD2d 887).

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Creeden
150 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 925, 585 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fitzgerald-nyappdiv-1992.