People v. Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fitzgerald

171 A.D.2d 878

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D.2d 878 (People v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fitzgerald, 171 A.D.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered February 24, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the bill of particulars provided by the People, raised for the first time on appeal, is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). Further, the defendant forfeited his right to seek appellate review of that claim by his plea of guilty (see, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686, 688; People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, 601-602).

Finally, we have considered the contentions addressed in the defendant’s letter, attached to the brief of his appellate counsel, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered February 24, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the bill of particulars provided by the People, raised for the first time on appeal, is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). Further, the defendant forfeited his right to seek appellate review of that claim by his plea of guilty (see, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686, 688; People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, 601-602).

Finally, we have considered the contentions addressed in the defendant’s letter, attached to the brief of his appellate counsel, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fitzgerald-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack