People v. Ferguson
This text of 759 N.W.2d 195 (People v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Summary Disposition January 16, 2009:
Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of that part of the defendant’s application challenging the imposition of attorney fees in light of People v Trapp (On Remand), 280 Mich App 598 (2008), and the prosecution’s concessions that the trial court failed to articulate that it considered the defendant’s ability to pay the cost of his court-appointed attorney at the time of sentencing and that a remand is necessary to enable the court to do so. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction. Court of Appeals No. 283172.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
759 N.W.2d 195, 483 Mich. 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ferguson-mich-2009.