People v. Ferguson

California Court of Appeal

People v. Ferguson

117 Cal. App. 519

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 17, 1931

DocketCrim. No. 1632

StatusPublished

This text of 117 Cal. App. 519 (People v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ferguson, 117 Cal. App. 519 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

Defendants were accused by the district attorney of the city and county of San Francisco of a [520]*520felony, to wit, conspiracy to commit robbery. Upon arraignment they pleaded not guilty. They were tried and convicted as charged in the information and sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin. Oral notice of appeal was given, but defendants have failed to file a brief in support of the appeal, nor did they appear by counsel when the case was called for hearing. We have examined the record and find no grounds for a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TYLER, P. J.

Defendants were accused by the district attorney of the city and county of San Francisco of a [520]*520felony, to wit, conspiracy to commit robbery. Upon arraignment they pleaded not guilty. They were tried and convicted as charged in the information and sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin. Oral notice of appeal was given, but defendants have failed to file a brief in support of the appeal, nor did they appear by counsel when the case was called for hearing. We have examined the record and find no grounds for a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 Cal. App. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ferguson-calctapp-1931.