People v. Ferguson

California Court of Appeal

People v. Ferguson

117 Cal. App. 519

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ferguson. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Cal. App. 41 →

California Court of Appeal·Decided October 17, 1931·No. Crim. No. 1632·Published

Opinion

TYLER, P. J.

Defendants were accused by the district attorney of the city and county of San Francisco of a [520]*520felony, to wit, conspiracy to commit robbery. Upon arraignment they pleaded not guilty. They were tried and convicted as charged in the information and sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin. Oral notice of appeal was given, but defendants have failed to file a brief in support of the appeal, nor did they appear by counsel when the case was called for hearing. We have examined the record and find no grounds for a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TYLER, P. J.

Defendants were accused by the district attorney of the city and county of San Francisco of a [520]*520felony, to wit, conspiracy to commit robbery. Upon arraignment they pleaded not guilty. They were tried and convicted as charged in the information and sentenced to the state prison at San Quentin. Oral notice of appeal was given, but defendants have failed to file a brief in support of the appeal, nor did they appear by counsel when the case was called for hearing. We have examined the record and find no grounds for a reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.

People v. Ferguson, 117 Cal. App. 519 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

117 Cal. App. 519 (People v. Ferguson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.