People v. Fellman
This text of 321 N.E.2d 880 (People v. Fellman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: “Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Respondent argued that CPL 450.20 (subd. 2) allowing the prosecutor to appeal a trial order of dismissal (CPL 290.10) entered at the defendant’s request in a nonjury case, violates the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment. ’ ’ The Court of Appeals considered this contention and found that there was no violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. [See 35 N Y 2d 158.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
321 N.E.2d 880, 35 N.Y.2d 853, 363 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fellman-ny-1974.