People v. Estrada
105 A.D.2d 753, 481 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20872
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Estrada. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 A.D.2d 977 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1984·Published
Opinion
Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldman, J.), rendered March 26,1982, affirmed.
The statements which defendant made in the telephone call to the police which he, himself, initiated, were clearly spontaneous, and the hearing court properly refused to suppress them (see, e.g., People v Kaye, 25 NY2d 139, 145; People v Maerling, 46 NY2d 289). Weinstein, J. P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Estrada, 105 A.D.2d 753, 481 N.Y.S.2d 646, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
105 A.D.2d 753 (People v. Estrada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Kaye
250 N.E.2d 329 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. Maerling
385 N.E.2d 1245 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)