People v. Esposito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Esposito

121 A.D.2d 561, 503 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58547

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 121 A.D.2d 561 (People v. Esposito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Esposito, 121 A.D.2d 561, 503 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by the People (1) from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), entered July 23, 1984, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, [562]*562entered September 24, 1984, as upon granting the People’s motion for reargument, adhered to its original determination.

Appeal from the order entered July 23, 1984, dismissed. That order was superseded by the order entered September 24, 1984, made upon reargument.

Order entered September 24, 1984, affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The County Court correctly held that the evidence before the Grand Jury was not legally sufficient to establish that the defendant committed the crime of grand larceny in the third degree (see, CPL 70.10 [1]; 190.65 [1]), inasmuch as the defendant’s confession was not corroborated by additional proof that the offense charged had been committed (see, CPL 60.50). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the People (1) from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), entered July 23, 1984, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, and (2) as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, [562]*562entered September 24, 1984, as upon granting the People’s motion for reargument, adhered to its original determination.

Appeal from the order entered July 23, 1984, dismissed. That order was superseded by the order entered September 24, 1984, made upon reargument.

Order entered September 24, 1984, affirmed insofar as appealed from.

The County Court correctly held that the evidence before the Grand Jury was not legally sufficient to establish that the defendant committed the crime of grand larceny in the third degree (see, CPL 70.10 [1]; 190.65 [1]), inasmuch as the defendant’s confession was not corroborated by additional proof that the offense charged had been committed (see, CPL 60.50). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 561, 503 N.Y.S.2d 611, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-esposito-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack