People v. Esposito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Esposito

137 A.D.2d 615, 524 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1054

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 137 A.D.2d 615 (People v. Esposito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Esposito, 137 A.D.2d 615, 524 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered May 21, 1986, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Pitaro, J.), after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The only issue raised involves the propriety of the search warrant issued in this case. We find that the search warrant was properly issued for reasons stated by Justice Pitaro in his decision denying suppression. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered May 21, 1986, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Pitaro, J.), after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The only issue raised involves the propriety of the search warrant issued in this case. We find that the search warrant was properly issued for reasons stated by Justice Pitaro in his decision denying suppression. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 A.D.2d 615, 524 N.Y.S.2d 365, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-esposito-nyappdiv-1988.