People v. Espinal

102 A.D.3d 885, 957 N.Y.S.2d 906
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Espinal. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 A.D.3d 435

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed December 22, 2009, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 739 [2006]; People v Kidd, 100 AD3d 779 [2012]; cf. People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803 [2012]). “[W]hen a defendant enters into a guilty plea that includes a valid waiver of the right to appeal, that waiver includes any challenge to the severity of the sentence” (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Espinal, 102 A.D.3d 885, 957 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

102 A.D.3d 885 (People v. Espinal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Kidd
100 A.D.3d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Pelaez
100 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)