People v. Espinal

102 A.D.3d 885, 957 N.Y.S.2d 906

This text of 102 A.D.3d 885 (People v. Espinal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Espinal, 102 A.D.3d 885, 957 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), imposed December 22, 2009, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 739 [2006]; People v Kidd, 100 AD3d 779 [2012]; cf. People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803 [2012]). “[W]hen a defendant enters into a guilty plea that includes a valid waiver of the right to appeal, that waiver includes any challenge to the severity of the sentence” (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Kidd
100 A.D.3d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Pelaez
100 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A.D.3d 885, 957 N.Y.S.2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-espinal-nyappdiv-2013.