People v. Espinal

77 A.D.3d 529, 908 N.Y.S.2d 877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Espinal. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 A.D.3d 435

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J), entered on or about November 19, 2009, which specified and informed defendant that the court would resentence him to a term of seven years, followed by three years’ postrelease supervision, for his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, unanimously affirmed, and the matter remanded to Supreme Court, New York County for further proceedings upon defendant’s application for resentencing.

We perceive no basis for reducing the proposed term, which [530]*530was offered upon consideration of all the appropriate factors, including defendant’s prison disciplinary record (see People v Rincon, 40 AD3d 538 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 880 [2007]). Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Freedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Espinal, 77 A.D.3d 529, 908 N.Y.S.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

77 A.D.3d 529 (People v. Espinal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rincon
40 A.D.3d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)