People v. Esparza
This text of 167 N.W.2d 598 (People v. Esparza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
J. H. Gillis, P. J. and Quinn, J.
Michael Frank Esparza pled guilty to possession of narcotics in violation of CLS 1961, § 335.153 (Stat Ann 1957 Eev § 18.1123), and was sentenced. On appeal, he contends that his plea was induced by .a', promise by [147]*147authorities to return his automobile which had been ordered forfeited, and that he was innocent because of entrapment by police.
We find no support in the record for these claims. On the contrary the transcript of the plea discloses that defendant’s plea was freely, understanding^, and voluntarily made, without promises of any kind. The record offers no support for the claim of innocence. If the record supported defendant’s contention that he was induced to obtain and sell narcotics by a police informer, no defense would be established thereby. People v. Martin (1965), 1 Mich App 265, 270. The record demonstrates compliance with GCR 1963, 785.3.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 N.W.2d 598, 16 Mich. App. 145, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-esparza-michctapp-1969.