People v. Erving
113 A.D.3d 789, 978 N.Y.2d 895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Erving. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 A.D.3d 447 →
Opinion
The defendant’s knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Amaya, 98 AD3d 583 [2012]; cf. People v Braithwaite, 73 AD3d 656 [2010]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Erving, 113 A.D.3d 789, 978 N.Y.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 789 (People v. Erving) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Braithwaite
73 A.D.3d 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Amaya
98 A.D.3d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)