People v. Amaya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Amaya

98 A.D.3d 583, 949 N.Y.S.2d 641

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 8, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 98 A.D.3d 583 (People v. Amaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Amaya, 98 A.D.3d 583, 949 N.Y.S.2d 641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J), imposed April 6, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that his sentence was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dillon, Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J), imposed April 6, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that his sentence was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dillon, Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 A.D.3d 583, 949 N.Y.S.2d 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-amaya-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack