People v. Amaya
98 A.D.3d 583, 949 N.Y.S.2d 641
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 8, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J), imposed April 6, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his claim that his sentence was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]). Mastro, A.P.J., Dillon, Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Amaya, 98 A.D.3d 583, 949 N.Y.S.2d 641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
98 A.D.3d 583 (People v. Amaya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Erving
113 A.D.3d 789 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)