People v. Ervin
This text of 156 A.D.2d 977 (People v. Ervin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We affirm for the same reasons expressed in the memorandum in the case of People v Ervin (156 AD2d 977 [decided herewith]). In addition, defendant’s contention that the verdict sheets were not proper is unpreserved for review since he failed to object to their submission (see, People v Rodriguez, 144 AD2d 598, Iv denied 73 NY2d 895; People v Battles, 141 AD2d 748, Iv denied 72 NY2d 1043; People v Monroe, 135 AD2d 741). Were we to reach that contention, we would determine that it lacks merit (see, People v Fields, 134 AD2d 365, Iv denied 72 NY2d 956). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J. — manslaughter, first degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Law-ton. JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 A.D.2d 977, 550 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ervin-nyappdiv-1989.