People v. Ervin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ervin

125 A.D.2d 406, 509 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62690

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 125 A.D.2d 406 (People v. Ervin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ervin, 125 A.D.2d 406, 509 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered June 3, 1982, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to claim that he was denied a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (see, People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009; People v Howe, 56 NY2d 622; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940). Moreover, by failing to move to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing, the defendant failed to preserve the issue for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636).

The defendant’s constitutional speedy trial claim is likewise without merit (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jaspan, J.), rendered June 3, 1982, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to claim that he was denied a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 (see, People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009; People v Howe, 56 NY2d 622; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940). Moreover, by failing to move to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing, the defendant failed to preserve the issue for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636).

The defendant’s constitutional speedy trial claim is likewise without merit (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 A.D.2d 406, 509 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ervin-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack