People v. Epps
This text of 305 A.D.2d 697 (People v. Epps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered November 15, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt because it was more consistent with intentional murder than depraved indifference murder is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858 [1987]; People v Ferguson, 240 AD2d 510 [1997]; People v Fama, 212 AD2d 542 [1995]), and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Sanchez, 98 NY2d 373 [2002]; People v Crawford, 295 AD2d 361 [2002]; People v Flowers, 289 AD2d 504 [2001]; People v Lyons, 280 AD2d 926 [2001]; People v Tankleff, 199 AD2d 550 [1993], affd 84 NY2d 992 [1994]; People v Abney, 173 AD2d 545 [1991]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Smith, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 A.D.2d 697, 759 N.Y.S.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-epps-nyappdiv-2003.