People v. Epps

118 A.D.3d 1018, 987 N.Y.S.2d 855
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 2014·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered December 17, 2012, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea (see People v Pryor, 11 AD3d 565, 566 [2004]). In any event, the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]).

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, as defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85 [1982]).

Mastro, J.E, Hall, Lott, Austin and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Epps, 118 A.D.3d 1018, 987 N.Y.S.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

118 A.D.3d 1018 (People v. Epps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sulaiman
134 A.D.3d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)