People v. English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. English

232 A.D.2d 671, 647 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9983

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. English. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 871 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 10, 1996·Published

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, J.), rendered May 20, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree.

[672]*672Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the charge of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and was sentenced to a term of 2 to 4 years’ imprisonment in accordance therewith. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with the conclusion of defense counsel that this case presents no nonfrivolous issues. The judgment should, accordingly, be affirmed and defense counsel’s request to be relieved of his assignment should be granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, J.), rendered May 20, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree.

[672]*672Pursuant to a plea bargain, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the charge of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and was sentenced to a term of 2 to 4 years’ imprisonment in accordance therewith. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with the conclusion of defense counsel that this case presents no nonfrivolous issues. The judgment should, accordingly, be affirmed and defense counsel’s request to be relieved of his assignment should be granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

People v. English, 232 A.D.2d 671, 647 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

232 A.D.2d 671 (People v. English) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related