People v. English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. English

262 A.D.2d 868, 691 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7495

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 868 (People v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. English, 262 A.D.2d 868, 691 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Ledina, J.), rendered June 29, 1998, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced to five years’ probation. As part of the plea bargain, defendant also waived her right to appeal the conviction, and never moved to vacate or withdraw her plea. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with defense counsel’s assertion that there are no nonfrivolous or arguably meritorious issues that can be raised on appeal (see, People v George, 261 AD2d 711). The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Ledina, J.), rendered June 29, 1998, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and was sentenced to five years’ probation. As part of the plea bargain, defendant also waived her right to appeal the conviction, and never moved to vacate or withdraw her plea. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with defense counsel’s assertion that there are no nonfrivolous or arguably meritorious issues that can be raised on appeal (see, People v George, 261 AD2d 711). The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 868, 691 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-english-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack