People v. Elmer
This text of 112 Cal. App. 2d 415 (People v. Elmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE PEOPLE, Respondent,
v.
JAMES E. ELMER, Appellant.
California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Three.
James E. Elmer, in pro. per., for Appellant.
Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, for Respondent.
THE COURT.
Appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The sole ground of the petition was that petitioner was persuaded to enter a plea of guilty to forgery with a prior conviction, by the representation of his counsel that he would receive a light sentence, and that he received instead a sentence to state prison. No claim was asserted that any peace officer, the district attorney or the court had any part in the alleged representations or any knowledge of them. Petitions for habeas corpus have been heretofore filed by petitioner with various courts and have been denied.
[1] The present petition based solely upon alleged representations of petitioner's attorney presented no sufficient ground for granting the order sought. The appeal is without merit. (People v. Aseltine, 139 Cal.App. 768 [34 P.2d 830]; People v. Deutsch, 16 Cal.App.2d 121 [60 P.2d 155].)
The order is affirmed. *416
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 Cal. App. 2d 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-elmer-calctapp-1952.