People v. Ellis

2021 NY Slip Op 02761, 143 N.Y.S.3d 210, 194 A.D.3d 428
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 4, 2021
DocketInd No. 1174/15 Appeal No. 13749 Case No. 2018-4692
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 02761 (People v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ellis, 2021 NY Slip Op 02761, 143 N.Y.S.3d 210, 194 A.D.3d 428 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Ellis (2021 NY Slip Op 02761)
People v Ellis
2021 NY Slip Op 02761
Decided on May 04, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 04, 2021
Before: Acosta, P.J., Manzanet-Daniels, Moulton, Scarpulla, JJ.

Ind No. 1174/15 Appeal No. 13749 Case No. 2018-4692

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Frank Ellis, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Teighlor S. Bonner of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Marianne Stracquadanio of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Miriam R. Best, J. at omnibus motion; Alvin M. Yearwood, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered May 14, 2018, convicting defendant of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid because the court did not make clear that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from the numerous other trial rights automatically forfeited upon pleading guilty. However, by pleading guilty, defendant independently forfeited his claim that inadmissible evidence was presented to the grand jury (see People v Hansen , 95 NY2d 227, 230 [2000]). In any event, the isolated references to defendant's criminal history fell far short of an impairment of the integrity of the grand jury proceeding (see CPL 210.35 [5]), and defendant did not meet the exacting standard that must be satisfied before the extraordinary remedy of dismissal of the indictment is warranted (see People v Darby , 75 NY2d 449, 455 [1990]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 4, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Boone
2025 NY Slip Op 05357 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Fernandez
2024 NY Slip Op 06671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Cisse
2024 NY Slip Op 03093 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Bonilla
2022 NY Slip Op 07304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 02761, 143 N.Y.S.3d 210, 194 A.D.3d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ellis-nyappdiv-2021.