People v. Elias

2016 NY Slip Op 6838, 143 A.D.3d 908, 38 N.Y.S.3d 916
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 19, 2016·No. 2014-07139·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed June 25, 2014, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 266 [2011 ]; People v Barksdale, 131 AD3d 704 [2015]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence *909 imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Elias, 2016 NY Slip Op 6838, 143 A.D.3d 908, 38 N.Y.S.3d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 6838 (People v. Elias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Barksdale
131 A.D.3d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)