People v. Elias

134 A.D.3d 734, 19 N.Y.S.3d 779
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 2015·No. 2014-02757·Published

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), both imposed March 12, 2014, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Elias, 134 A.D.3d 734, 19 N.Y.S.3d 779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 734 (People v. Elias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)