People v. Elauim

212 N.W.2d 292, 49 Mich. App. 559, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 855
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 1973·No. Docket 13299·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

V. J. Brennan, J.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of first-degree murder committed in the perpetration of a robbery (MCLA 750.316; MSA 28.548) and sentenced for the mandatory term of life imprisonment. Three eyewitnesses identified him as a participant in a robbery-mur[561]*561der occurring at the American Auto Parts Store in Detroit, December 9, 1970.

His sole claim on appeal is that the trial court erred in excluding a letter offered by defendant to impeach one of the eyewitnesses. It was offered as a prior inconsistent statement and was identified and acknowledged by the witness. The text of the letter was ambiguous and standing alone posed no contradiction to any of the witness’s prior testimony. The trial court gave defense counsel further opportunity to explain the letter and connect it to the testimony. This defense counsel refused to do. Defense counsel failed to establish the relevancy of the letter. On this basis the trial court’s ruling to exclude the letter was not error.

Affirmed.

O’Hara, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Elauim, 212 N.W.2d 292, 49 Mich. App. 559, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 855 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).

212 N.W.2d 292 (People v. Elauim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Elauim
212 N.W.2d 292 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)