People v. Eason
234 A.D.2d 996, 652 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13803
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1996·Published
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The contention of defendant that his sentence is unduly harsh or severe does not survive the voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v McCall, 231 AD2d 859). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.— Promoting Prostitution, 3rd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Eason, 234 A.D.2d 996, 652 N.Y.S.2d 568, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
234 A.D.2d 996 (People v. Eason) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. McCall
231 A.D.2d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)