People v. Durr

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Durr

16 Mich. App. 763

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 1969

DocketDocket No. 5,426

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Mich. App. 763 (People v. Durr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Durr, 16 Mich. App. 763 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug (CLS 1961, § 335-[764]*764.153; Stat Ann 1957 Eev §18.1123) and appeals. The brief on appeal contends that the trial court should have granted a directed verdict of not guilty, based on an asserted variance between the information and proofs relating to the quantity of the drug possessed.

A motion to affirm has -been filed on the ground that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission., (G-CR 1963, 817.5[3].) We agree. “A variance between pleading and proof as to the amount of the subject matter involved in the alleged offense is not material when the amount is not an ingredient of the offense.” 5 Wharton’s Criminal Law & Procedure, § 2067, p 222.

,-Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug (CLS 1961, § 335-[764]*764.153; Stat Ann 1957 Eev §18.1123) and appeals. The brief on appeal contends that the trial court should have granted a directed verdict of not guilty, based on an asserted variance between the information and proofs relating to the quantity of the drug possessed.

A motion to affirm has -been filed on the ground that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission., (G-CR 1963, 817.5[3].) We agree. “A variance between pleading and proof as to the amount of the subject matter involved in the alleged offense is not material when the amount is not an ingredient of the offense.” 5 Wharton’s Criminal Law & Procedure, § 2067, p 222.

,-Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Mich. App. 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-durr-michctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack