People v. Diggs

36 A.D.3d 933, 827 N.Y.S.2d 670
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Diggs. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 A.D.3d 1098

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), rendered September 6, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid and unrestricted waiver of the right to appeal as part of his plea agreement precludes appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761 [1993]; People v Sider, 232 AD2d 666 [1996]; see also People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]). Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diggs, 36 A.D.3d 933, 827 N.Y.S.2d 670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

36 A.D.3d 933 (People v. Diggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Allen
623 N.E.2d 1170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Schuman
232 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)