People v. Schuman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Schuman

232 A.D.2d 666, 648 N.Y.S.2d 991, 649 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11330

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 28, 1996·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered September 22, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered September 22, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

People v. Schuman, 232 A.D.2d 666, 648 N.Y.S.2d 991, 649 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

232 A.D.2d 666 (People v. Schuman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related