People v. Dickerson

156 N.Y.S.3d 881, 201 A.D.3d 731, 2022 NY Slip Op 00185
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 12, 2022
DocketInd. No. 4049/18
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 156 N.Y.S.3d 881 (People v. Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dickerson, 156 N.Y.S.3d 881, 201 A.D.3d 731, 2022 NY Slip Op 00185 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Dickerson (2022 NY Slip Op 00185)
People v Dickerson
2022 NY Slip Op 00185
Decided on January 12, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 12, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
ROBERT J. MILLER
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

2019-03672
(Ind. No. 4049/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Bryce Dickerson, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel; Marielle Burnett and Lawrance Choi on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew D'Emic, J.), rendered March 14, 2019, convicting him of aggravated criminal contempt, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating so much of the sentence as imposed mandatory surcharges and fees; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

As consented to by the People, we modify the judgment by vacating the surcharges and fees imposed on the defendant at sentencing (see People v Henry P.-M., 196 AD3d 650; People v Dyshawn B., 196 AD3d 638; People v Johnson, 193 AD3d 1076).

BARROS, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, MILLER and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Williams
201 N.Y.S.3d 480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Peacock
188 N.Y.S.3d 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. King
180 N.Y.S.3d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Acevedo
210 A.D.3d 1106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Riddick
167 N.Y.S.3d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Allen
2022 NY Slip Op 03525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Reeves
163 N.Y.S.3d 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Attah
203 A.D.3d 1063 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.Y.S.3d 881, 201 A.D.3d 731, 2022 NY Slip Op 00185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dickerson-nyappdiv-2022.