People v. Allen

203 A.D.3d 1574, 161 N.Y.S.3d 899, 2022 NY Slip Op 01646
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 11, 2022
Docket133 KA 17-01697
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 203 A.D.3d 1574 (People v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Allen, 203 A.D.3d 1574, 161 N.Y.S.3d 899, 2022 NY Slip Op 01646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Allen (2022 NY Slip Op 01646)
People v Allen
2022 NY Slip Op 01646
Decided on March 11, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 11, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

133 KA 17-01697

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

REMY D. ALLEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (HELEN SYME OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas E. Moran, J.), rendered August 14, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Defendant does not raise any challenge to the validity of his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Seymore, 188 AD3d 1767, 1768 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 36 NY3d 1100 [2021]; People v Rosado-Thomas, 181 AD3d 1166, 1166 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 1048 [2020]). Thus, defendant's challenge to the severity of the postrelease supervision component of his agreed-upon sentence "is foreclosed by his unchallenged waiver of the right to appeal" (Rosado-Thomas, 181 AD3d at 1167; see Seymore, 188 AD3d at 1770).

Entered: March 11, 2022

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Sullivan
2025 NY Slip Op 04421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Lewis
2025 NY Slip Op 03459 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Halsey
202 N.Y.S.3d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.3d 1574, 161 N.Y.S.3d 899, 2022 NY Slip Op 01646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-allen-nyappdiv-2022.