People v. Diaz

80 A.D.3d 432, 913 N.Y.S.2d 555
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Diaz. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 A.D.3d 919

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), entered March 19, 2008, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed points under the risk factor for drug abuse, based on defendant’s statements contained in his presentence report. In any event, even without that assessment, defendant would remain a level two offender, and we find no basis for a discretionary downward departure (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 80 A.D.3d 432, 913 N.Y.S.2d 555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

80 A.D.3d 432 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)