People v. Diaz

61 A.D.3d 465, 875 N.Y.S.2d 892
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), entered on or about February 8, 2008, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level two sex offender adjudication. The court properly assessed points under the factor for lack of supervised release, even though this was a matter beyond defendant’s control (see People v Lewis, 37 AD3d 689, 690 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 814 [2007]). The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and merit-less. Concur—Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 61 A.D.3d 465, 875 N.Y.S.2d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

61 A.D.3d 465 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nethercott
42 Misc. 3d 798 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)