People v. Desire

126 A.D.2d 737, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41887
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Desire. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 A.D.2d 952

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), rendered July 18, 1980, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (21 counts), robbery in the second degree (eight counts), [738]*738attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Desire, 126 A.D.2d 737, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

126 A.D.2d 737 (People v. Desire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)