People v. Desire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Desire

126 A.D.2d 737, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41887

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 26, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.2d 737 (People v. Desire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Desire, 126 A.D.2d 737, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), rendered July 18, 1980, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (21 counts), robbery in the second degree (eight counts), [738]*738attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), rendered July 18, 1980, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (21 counts), robbery in the second degree (eight counts), [738]*738attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 737, 510 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-desire-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack