People v. Derush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Derush

288 A.D.2d 563, 734 N.Y.S.2d 500, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10351

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 A.D.2d 563 (People v. Derush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Derush, 288 A.D.2d 563, 734 N.Y.S.2d 500, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Hemmett, Jr., J.), rendered May 5, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery in the second degree and was sentenced, as part of a negotiated plea agreement, to a determinate term of 10 years in prison. Defendant appeals contending that his sentence is harsh and excessive. Our review of the record disclosed no extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification in the interest of justice (see, People v Saunders, 277 AD2d 512, lv denied 96 NY2d 763; People v Moneyhan, 248 AD2d 756, lv denied 91 NY2d 1010). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Hemmett, Jr., J.), rendered May 5, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery in the second degree and was sentenced, as part of a negotiated plea agreement, to a determinate term of 10 years in prison. Defendant appeals contending that his sentence is harsh and excessive. Our review of the record disclosed no extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification in the interest of justice (see, People v Saunders, 277 AD2d 512, lv denied 96 NY2d 763; People v Moneyhan, 248 AD2d 756, lv denied 91 NY2d 1010). Accordingly, we decline to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 A.D.2d 563, 734 N.Y.S.2d 500, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-derush-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack