People v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Saunders

272 A.D.2d 347, 707 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4877

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leach, J.), rendered February 17, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to his contention on appeal, the defendant received the alleged Rosario material in sufficient time to make meaningful use of it, and was not substantially prejudiced by the delay (see, People v Ranghelle, 69 NY2d 56; see, e.g., People v Farner, 234 AD2d 561). Santucci, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leach, J.), rendered February 17, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to his contention on appeal, the defendant received the alleged Rosario material in sufficient time to make meaningful use of it, and was not substantially prejudiced by the delay (see, People v Ranghelle, 69 NY2d 56; see, e.g., People v Farner, 234 AD2d 561). Santucci, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

People v. Saunders, 272 A.D.2d 347, 707 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

272 A.D.2d 347 (People v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related