People v. Davis
97 A.D.3d 763, 947 N.Y.2d 913
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 18, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; People v Moyett, 7 NY3d 892, 893 [2006]; People v Jacob, 94 AD3d 1142 [2012]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, A.P.J, Dillon, Eng, Lott and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Davis, 97 A.D.3d 763, 947 N.Y.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
97 A.D.3d 763 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. McAvoy
103 A.D.3d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)