People v. Davis

66 A.D.3d 796, 886 N.Y.S.2d 350
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 A.D.3d 1179

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant pursuant to CPL 450.10 (5) from an order of the Supreme Court, Bangs County (Firetog, J.), dated May 12, 2006, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s [797]*797assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Davis, 66 A.D.3d 796, 886 N.Y.S.2d 350 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

66 A.D.3d 796 (People v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)